Receiving and storage controls
Delivery notes, tank dips, custody of fuel on receipt and storage logbooks that trace litres into your system.
Diesel management · fuel systems · South Africa
Diesel refund and diesel rebate positions fail when records cannot prove how fuel moved through your operation. Meridian helps mining and industrial businesses design practical diesel management and fuel management controls around dispensing, receiving, meters, diesel logbooks, assets and reconciliations — so litres, equipment and submissions align.
Many fuel-related disputes start because the business cannot show a clear chain from purchase to tank to asset to qualifying activity. Spreadsheets and position papers do not fix unmetered dispensing, missing delivery notes or diesel logbooks that never reconcile.
Meridian provides project-based advisory on diesel management, fuel management systems and operational controls for South African mining, quarrying, logistics and industrial operators where fuel volume and evidence complexity are high — especially where those controls must support SARS diesel refund claims.
Delivery notes, tank dips, custody of fuel on receipt and storage logbooks that trace litres into your system.
Meter discipline, nozzle allocation, asset tagging and usage records tied to equipment—not generic summaries.
Month-end tie-outs from purchase through consumption, variance thresholds and actionable exception reports.
Registers, equipment lists and site maps that connect diesel use to eligible activities under scrutiny.
Logbook templates, data flows and controls aligned with SARS expectations and the 2026 diesel refund platform.
VAT-to-platform migration guideSARS tests whether litres claimed match operational reality. Weak dispensing, receiving or reconciliation controls create evidence gaps that undermine diesel refund positions even when the legal interpretation is sound.
Common problems include unmetered dispensing, missing delivery notes, tank dips without reconciliations, unclear asset allocation, manual logbooks that do not tie to source data, and site-level practices that differ from what submissions describe.
Yes. Many improvements are process and reporting changes: clearer custody of fuel, better reconciliations, exception reporting and record discipline. Hardware upgrades are recommended only where meters or systems genuinely cannot support defensible records.
Strong controls produce better data. Meridian can advise on compliance-oriented analytics—reconciliations, variance reporting and exception identification—once the underlying fuel journey is mapped.